Gun Control in the United States - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2729 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/03/19 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Gun Control Essay Did you like this example? Gun Control in the United States In the year 2018 there have been 307 mass shootings around the United States. To put this into perspective, we are 312 days into the year, meaning the US has had nearly as many mass shootings as days in 2018, says Melia Robinson, Skye Gould and Samantha Lee from Business Insider. A more effective screening process for purchasing a weapon needs to be put in place to help prevent unsafe people from owning guns. Federal agencies do not have full knowledge of who is getting a background check to obtain a firearm due to a large portion of the United States that is not voluntarily providing background check information to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Reporting information to federal agencies is optional, federal law does not require states to submit information to NICS; participation is strictly voluntary (Giffords Law Center). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Gun Control in the United States" essay for you Create order The way that the national and state firearm regulations are now needs to be addressed so that there is no longer a lack of background check information on a national basis. Information that would prohibit an unsafe person, even with a mental illness or disability, from purchasing a firearm is not voluntarily reported. A state does not have to report this information to make it known nationally and those documents will not be able to stop an unsafe person from passing a background check in another state if they choose to purchase elsewhere. These documents are not accessible because some states believe it is a privacy problem giving out a persons medical records. Providing this information to the NICS only gives out a persons name, date of birth and information about their mental state that is vague. No clinical information is given to the NICS, only enough information to identify the person and that persons problem that is preventing them from owning a firearm. Confidentiality still exists between a person and their health care professional. Another reason this is a problem is if someone wants to purchase a firearm in another state, they are able to do so by providing dishonest information when filling out a background check. There are currently no laws preventing this from happening. Since the last elections in 2010, as a result of the 2010 midterm elections, the rise of the Tea Party, and the subsequent reapportionment of state legislative districts, the balance of power in a number of state legislatures significantly shifted to conservatives opposed to firearms regulation and federal authority. (William 885). The year 2020 is the next time state legislative reapportionment will occur. There are currently four states that require a mental health screening along with their background checks and they are choosing not to report these documents to the NICS. Arkansas, Michigan, Ohio and Utah are the states that are participating in this and these states do not address disclosure to the NICS. Colorado, Florida, Nebraska, Missouri, Pennsylvania and West Virginia are not required to disclose to the NICS even though it is authorized. Time periods for reporting mental health records range from immediately to one month. Some states are required to report mental health records upon order from a court or in a timely manner. There is too much leeway in the urgency of reporting these documents. Changes that need to be made in the United States are not able to happen until the year 2020. If we can implement a screening process that involves federal agencies having complete access to all background check information in the United States, there will be less room for individuals to slip through the cracks. There of course have been an overwhelming amount of shootings that have been committed solely because of mental health of the assailant at the time of the incident. The United States has put mental health on the backburner in the recent years due to budget cuts and federal funding. In 2015, mental health care had taken an approximate $4.35 billion cut from their budgets. Reduction of these services could further link to more mass shootings with these ill persons readily having access to firearms. The state legislatures need to start incorporating resources to be available to the mentally ill. Raising awareness and educating the public could significantly help to reduce the possibility of these violent crimes. With the negative stigma that goes along with mental health, these people need serious medical help and should not be ridiculed for such thing. Having such resources or education available community wide would greatly help the chance of recovery. Putting forth effort, resources, and public education towards mental illness could begin efforts to alleviate the negative connotation and begin to get help to those in need before another eruption involving gun violence happens. Although mental healthcare is not a profitable branch of medicine, the bottom line is these people need help. The perpetrator receiving treatment in a timely and effective manner would help to prevent future violent crimes, whereas these behaviors and illnesses being ignored could lead to many more mass shootings. As a mother, its dismaying to realize children are no longer safe anywhere, under parental supervision or not. Places once thought of as excitement, such as a movie theater, shopping mall, school, church, etc. have all become places of mass gun violence. One step at time, the United States needs to start making strides to protect those children that will become our future. With the amount of mass shootings going on around the United States we need to bind together and rally around making a safe place to live. Without trial and error there is no true way to know what could help impact safety around dangerous individuals getting their hands on firearms. There should be a desire to enforce stricter laws to prevent those who have mental illnesses, those who have perpetrated domestic or animal abuse, and individuals with drug or alcohol charges from purchasing a deadly weapon. The gun violence restraining order (GVRO) has been trialed in California since 2014. California is the first state in the US to trial this new law and hopes to have more states follow their lead in the near future. This law gives the right to any spouse, whether by marriage or not, domestic partner, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household (Frattaroli, Shannon) to file a GVRO after noting or observing behaviors in which potentially dangerous behaviors have been or are being exhibited. This complaint is filed through the civil justice system and a petition will be filled to remove these weapons from the charged person(s) by law enforcement. There are also rules set in place on how someone can go through the motions and make the right steps into possibly receiving their firearms back with lengthy psychiatric help or anger management style courses. This is a temporary restraint and does not conclude the named individual has committed a crime. While this law is not bulletproof, it does give guidance to hose surrounding a potentially dangerous individual a place to make their claims and have them heard. It happens all too often after these mass shootings that the family/friends note the shooter had been displaying some odd or dangerous behaviors beforehand but they chose to look the other direction because there was nowhere to report to. If even a small percentage of those shooters could have been investigated, that would be a win for society. The United States should adopt greater mental health screening to obtain a gun, just as other countries have done and have been successful. Many other countries around the globe have a mandatory mental health screening to be able to purchase a firearm. Found in the article written by Audrey Carlsen and Sahil Chinoy are the processes in which a citizen of a specific country must to do to obtain a firearm. If the United States were to follow the footsteps of some of these other countries, a great number of the mass shootings we have experienced may have been easily prevented. By looking at the different processes, many other countries have strict rules as to how to obtain a firearm, and that includes psychological tests and mental health screening. In the US, the process is extremely easy and takes almost no time at all. All that is needed to purchase a gun, according to the article written by Carlsen and Chinoy, is to pass an instant background check. Most states do require an extended background check but even with that step the process is not nearly as extensive and thorough as a lot of other countries. One country that this article talks about is Japan, which has one of the longest gun-purchasing processes. The second step in the process, again according to the article written by Carlsen and Chinoy, is to receive a note from your doctor that says that you are mentally fit to own a gun and have no signs of drug abuse. Japan makes sure that the person purchasing a firearm is in stable condition and shows no harm to themselves or others. The United States needs to make a change in how easily Americans can buy or obtain guns, and one way to do this is by adding additional mental health screening to the requirements to purchase a gun. Some people believe that mental illness has nothing to do with the mass shootings that we are experiencing as a country and that making the process to obtain a gun longer wont help. There are a lot of articles that talk about whether there is any correlation between mass shootings and mental illness, and a lot of these articles say that there are no connections between the two. People believe that the media blames mental illness to give citizens something to blame for these terrible incidents. An article by Rachel Nuwer titled Is There a Link Between Mass Shootings and Mental Illness? talks about how many mass killers have mental illness. According to Nuwers research, a 2004 study found that out of more than 60 mass murders, only 6% were mentally ill and the people that commit mass shootings account for less than 1% of the gun-related homicides. Nuwer uses a quote in her article from a professor and director of psychiatric and law program at the University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, Renee Binder. Binger says, When one of these horrible mass shootings occurs, people say Anyone who would do such a thing must be mentally ill. Binger then goes on to say that we need to be careful while using the term mentally ill because often the individual may have something wrong, but they arent technically mentally ill. As all these ideas make sense and seem right, often, mental illnesses go undetected and undiagnosed, so it is difficult to say that mental illness does play a role or not. The United States still needs to ensure that everyone buying a gun, of any kind, are in the right mind and capable of handling a firearm in the right ways. There are many solutions to this enormous problem we face in the US. These three following organizations explain ways to reduce or prevent gun violence. The Prevention Institute organization has 14 different ways they recommend the preventions of gun violence. They divided them into four different subgroups including gun safety: reduce the imminent risk of lethality though sensible gun laws and a culture of safety, the underlying contributors to gun violence: systematically reduce risks and increase resilience in individuals, families, and communities, the prevention infrastructure: ensure effectiveness and sustainability of efforts, and lastly new frontiers: continue to learn, innovate, and increase impact through research and practice. This website has three phone numbers for contacting them. Their main office in Oakland, CA (510-444-7738), Los Angeles, CA (323294-4527), and one in Washington, D.C. (202-747-3496). They also added a list of 20 other organizations that talk about gun violence prevention that they found helpful. Adopting other countries ways of gun control. The Dave Kopel organization explains the ways of Canadas gun laws. Canada for instance has a uniform federal firearms control system that, while stricter than the controls in the United States overall, is more lenient than some American jurisdictions. Back in 1974 there was an incident with two young boys that ran around with rifles in a public school, the Canadian government quickly responded with stricter gun control by passing a new law in 1977 that required all prospective gun purchasers to receive a police approval and have two-character references. They have a phone number (303-279-6536) and an email address ([emailprotected]) for any comments or questions. There has also been talk of having teachers being armed in schools for protection. The Action Network organization talks about the SB 383 bill. Part of the bill states that this bill would allow school personnel to have access to firearms in school safety zones if they receive authorization from the school board of directors, are licensed to carry a concealed firearm and have met certain training requirements in the use and handling of firearms. This legislation will not mandate a schools participation but will give school boards the ability to establish policy and put in place protocols needed to enable personnel to exercise their ability to access a firearm on designated school property. (action network)This is an interesting way of preventing school shootings. However, school shootings are all that would protect against with this new bill. Statistically speaking school shooting are less likely to happen in comparison to other kinds of mass shootings. This website has an email address ([emailprotected]) for the public to send their comments and questions to. These three organizations explain ways of preventing mass shootings. With a more effective screening process preventing unsafe people from owning a firearm, mass shootings in the United States will hopefully come to an end. Adopting mental health screening as part of the background check requirements will help make gun control more effective in the United States. This approach on gun control and proof of other countries having success with a more in depth background check give us hope for change. More effective methods should be implemented and should stop being ignored. Our voice will not be heard unless we all can come together as a nation to make that voice louder. Any form of participation to make these changes is a step in the right direction for a safer country. These changes could help save the lives of many in the United States. Works Cited Carlsen, Audrey, and Sahil Chinoy. How to Buy a Gun in 15 Countries. The New York Times, The New York Times, 2 Mar. 2018, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/02/world/international-gun-laws.html. Frattaroli, Shannon. Gun Violence Restraining Orders: Alternative or Adjunct to Mental Health-Based Restrictions on Firearms? Behavioral Sciences the Law, vol. 33, no. 2/3, June 2015, pp. 290â€Å"307. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1002/bsl.2173. Prevention Institution Gun Violence Must Stop. Heres What We Can Do to Prevent More Deaths. Prevention Institute, 2018, www.preventioninstitute.org/focus-areas/preventing-violence-and-reducing-injury/preventing-vi olence-advocacy. Kopel, David. Canadian Gun Control: The Brady Bill Comes Due: The Printz Case and State Autonomy, 2018, davekopel.org/2A/LawRev/Canadian_Gun_Control.htm. Metzl, Johnathan M, and Kenneth T MacLeish. Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and the Politics of American Firearms. National Library of Medicine and Health, Feb. 2015, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318286/. Nuwer, Rachel. Future Is There a Link between Mass Shootings and Mental Illness? BBC News, BBC, 10 May 2018, www.bbc.com/future/story/20180509-is-there-a-link-between-mass-shooting-and-mental-illness. Robinson, Melia, et al. There Have Been 307 Mass Shootings in the US so Far in 2018 Heres the Full List. Business Insider, Business Insider, 8 Nov. 2018, www.businessinsider.com/how-many-mass-shootings-in-america-this-year-2018-2. Toohill, Kathleen. Mental Health Reporting. Edited by Brittany Neito and Kelly Drane, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/background-checks/mental-health-reporting/ Vizzard, William J. The Current And Future State Of Gun Policy In The United States. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 105. Issue 4 (Fall 2015): 879-904. Web. 18 November 2018. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7541context=jclc Wolf, Carolyn Reinach, and Jamie A. Rosen. Missing the Mark: Gun Control Is Not the Cure for What Ails the U.S. Mental Health System. Journal of Criminal Law Criminology, vol. 104, no. 4, Fall 2015, pp. 851â€Å"878. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=truedb=aphAN=110668172site=ehost-live

School Uniforms Essays - 475 Words

School Uniforms Until President Clinton called attention to the issue in his State of the Union address, mandatory public school uniform policies were sporadic local occurences. A few school districts had been quietly experimenting with uniforms for years, but the issue caught President Clintons eye after the Long Beach, California school district released some numbers suggesting that after only one year, its mandatory uniform policy had not only brought about significant decreases in vandalism and fighting, but had also led to higher test scores. Now that the Presidents endorsement has elevated school uniforms into the realm of federal education policy, a question needs to be answered: Are uniforms a good idea? The most†¦show more content†¦The fact is that there are no empirical studies that show that uniforms consistently produce positive changes in student behavior over the long run. At best, school uniform policies are purely experimental. The experiment presents some very practical problems. First, although President Clinton said he supported uniforms if it means that teen-agers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, the Long Beach policy, like virtually every other uniform policy in the country, applies only to elementary and middle school students, and not to teenagers. While younger children may be amenable to uniforms -- might even like them -- teenagers are different. Its axiomatic that adolescence is a time when young people strive to express their uniqueness and individuality in many different ways, and especially through fashion. Of course as several political cartoonists have pungently observed, teens are already in uniform -- baggy pants, T-shirts and baseball caps worn backward. But these are uniforms of teens own choosing, and not fashions dictated from above. School administrators and teachers know that teenagers are sure to rebel against uniforms policies; thats why so far theyve been reluct ant to impose them at the high school level. Second, for a public school uniform policy to be legal, it has to have an opt out provision. Every child in thisShow MoreRelatedSchool Uniforms And Schools Uniforms1211 Words   |  5 PagesSchool uniforms began their revolution in private schools; they represented a unique appearance, and provided a safe environment for the students attending. Private and Catholic schools were clever enough for implementing school uniforms, because without their influence public schools would have not adapted on creating a dress code for students. By introducing school uniforms in school policies they have managed to impact students learning environment in reducing stress, changing students’ behaviorRead MoreUniforms in School726 Words   |  3 PagesThe standard issue school uniform of khaki, navy and white once exclusive to the private parochial institutions is becoming a common requirement in public schools across the nation. This trend that was first suggested for public schools in 198 0 by then D. C. mayor, Marion Barry, to help diminish the social stigma of low income students has grown significantly in both numbers and reasons (Lawrence, 2013). In 2010, it was reported by the National Center for Education Statistics, that nearly 19% ofRead MoreSchools and Uniforms733 Words   |  3 PagesSchool Uniforms Uniforms in schools are a big debate around the world. Should we have uniforms in schools? The answer is yes because uniform help the schools. They bring to table a great deal of help because students are getting bullied, killed, and some may not have as much as other when shopping for clothes. Having uniforms bring safety to schools and what goes on after school. Why do we need uniforms? Most student have their own style, but a common argument against school uniforms is thatRead MoreSchool Uniform And School Uniforms937 Words   |  4 PagesSchool Uniform School uniforms keep students focused on their education not in their clothings. When all students are wearing the same outfit, they are less concerned about how they look and how they fit in with their peers. It’s easier for parent and students do not spend time choosing appropriate outfit for school day. It helps students can only concentrate on their schoolwork. Education is one of the big institutions for every kid that go to school. Also education is the roots that will help peopleRead MoreSchool Uniforms And Schools Uniforms819 Words   |  4 Pagesas school uniforms, many are quick to deem them as unjust and avoidable. What these individuals do not know is that, in fact, school uniforms would enhance how the learning environment functions. Surely, when schools provide their students with uniforms, they are not providing their students with dreadful apparel, they are providing their students with an opportunity to change; whether it be a chance for a student to change t heir role academically, or a chance for a student to fit in. School uniformsRead MoreSchool Uniforms1143 Words   |  5 PagesSchool uniforms make things more complicated Firstly, school is the place where all of us step in at a very tender age. In one word, life begins at school. It’s not just education but school gives us the platform to nurture our faith, emotions in such an early stage of life. The importance of making friends, working as a team- we learn all these in school. And wearing the same dress definitely brings a sense of unity among students. In every school there are students from different backgrounds butRead MoreSchool Uniforms: Yes or No?2109 Words   |  9 Pages3 March 2011 School Uniforms: A Non-Military Proposal for Swedens Students The word school uniform has negative connotations for many people. It makes them think of war, of soldier, of death, brainwashed airheads doing exactly the same as everybody else. It makes them think of reformed, collectivized groups of people with no personal identity. There are, however, reasons for the existence of the uniform; one of them being, as the name suggests, the purpose of uniting. At schools all around theRead MoreDress Codes And School Uniforms1248 Words   |  5 Pagesembarrassing than being dress coded at school? Enforcing a dress code among children is unfair because it not only discriminates against people but it destroys someone’s whole day. Dress codes and school uniforms are meant to increase student achievement and make everyone equal but instead it only hurts people. Most school dress codes are unnecessary and are sexist. Enforcing dress codes is suppose to boost student achievement but instead is racist, sexist and unnecessary. Schools should take in to considerationRead MoreShould School Uniforms For Wear Uniforms?969 Words   |  4 Pagesrequired to wear uniforms? In today’s society this is a very controversial subject across America. Many object uniforms because they feel uniforms don t allow students to have the freedom to express themselves the way they want. People feel uniforms undermine children s individuality. However, taking into consideration facts from both sides, what remains most important is the child s academics. To improve academics, schools should require all students to wear a uniform. Though uniforms may not be theRead MoreAre School Uniforms Beneficial Or Not?1098 Words   |  5 PagesAre School Uniforms Beneficial or Not? How does dressing and feeling the same as everybody else sound? Would it be enjoyable, or would it be no fun? According to Procon.org, the first recorded use of school uniforms in the United States was in 1994. In Europe around the early sixteenth century, school uniforms were made to tell the difference between poor students to the charity schools as opposed to other children. In London people thought that schools without uniforms were to be looked at as lower

Data Analysis And Discussion Science Fair Free Essays

Daphnia died on day seven in trial two. In a pH of five the Daphnia survived for six day s In trial one and six days in trial two. Len the pH of twelve the Daphnia survived for five days in trial one and in trial two the Daphnia survived for six days. We will write a custom essay sample on Data Analysis And Discussion Science Fair or any similar topic only for you Order Now ; The Daphnia survived less than a week under the strong acids and bases because Daphnia can easily become stressed under different conditions like t he pHs. The water tanks had an increase in Compounds that form H+ ions in the water ankhs (acids; pH of three and five) and an increase Compounds that form OH ions (basis; pH of twelve) as our classed has learned about this in the biochemistry unit. The reason why people would care about our data results and experiment is t hat the Daphnia and the the different pHs are just a representation of what can happen in the real world as aquatic habitats and ecosystems can be critically impacted as different forms Of acids, such as acidic rain and bases and can kill not just Daphnia but also other aquatic organism due to human activity. As w as inform people how vital pH can affect an entire habitat and even ecosystem Our hypothesis was valid because we proved that testing Daphnia in a strong pH (three and five) and a strong acid (twelve) the survival rate of the Daphnia would drop, which did as the Daphnia continued to day from day to day as the e acids and bases caused it harm. The relationship between the Daphnia and the level of independent variable was seen as we put the Daphnia in different pHs and saw that died in different WA How to cite Data Analysis And Discussion Science Fair, Papers

Supply, Demand, and Price Elasticity free essay sample

Caused significant rises in rice prices. In late April 2008, Thailand announced a project, called the Organization of Rice Exporting Countries (OREC) with the potential to develop into a price-fixing cartel for rice. However, experts affirm the blame for higher rice prices was based on the weak U. S. dollar. It is determine that when the value of the dollar falls, the prices of internationally traded commodities, like gold and rice increase because more dollars are needed to purchase the same quantity of any commodity. Commodities are products consumers purchase more of when the price of the commodity lowers. If the price of the commodity were to increase then consumers would buy less. Rice is a commodity and consumers will adjust the amount bought depending on the price of rice. Rice is considered to be a Griffin good. Griffin goods are inferior goods which have an upward sloping demand curve. The income effect is greater than the substitution effect. Normally with inferior goods, the income effect will cause the consumers to demand less of a good. The substitution of rice as the cost decreases, are other foods which are not normally available to poor consumers. If the cost of rise is lower, the consumer buys less and pends his or her additional income on foods which are preferable but not as affordable (Hubbard, OBrien, 2010). Insulin, however, would not show the same results as rice. Insulin, as a necessity, would keep the same demand if the price lowered or increased. If the cost of insulin decreased then it is likely to see an income effect for other goods purchased by diabetic consumers. The consumer would in a sense, have an increase of income. If the cost of the insulin increased the consumer demand would still remain the same but would need to decrease the demand for other goods. Next time when we go to an Asian restaurant and decided to have a rice dish, stop for a second and think about these questions; is the current world supply enough to fulfill the demand? Is the supply of grain and corn affecting the current price? What will the price be if there are shortage of supply and surplus of demand and how that would affect the equilibrium point? Try to answer those questions like we did in this paper. It will help you gain more respect for the rice and appreciate its value and the effects it have on all of us. Reference: Workman, Daniel (April 16, 2008). Leading Rice Export Countries. In Suite101 . com. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from http://www. suite101 . com/content/leading-rice- export-countries-a50965 . Bradsher, K. (2008, March 29). High Rice Cost Creating Fears of Asia Unrest. The New York Times. Retrieved from wrww. nytimes. com Hubbard, R. G. , OBrien, A. P. (2010). Economics. Boston: Prentice Hall. Supply, Demand, and Price Elasticity BY dannyl 3140 Supply, Demand, and Price Elasticity Paper Rice. ECO / 212: Principle of Economics Week 2 Learning Team Assignment With the growing cultural diversity in the San Francisco bay area, it is hard not to otice the Asian cuisines and restaurants in every corner of the block. Asian food had become a natural substitution choice for the American fast food; and rice, is the perfect substitution for wheat and flour. Rice is the seed of the monocot plant Oryza sativa. As a cereal grain, it is the most important staple food for a large part of the worlds human population, especially in East and South Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, and the West Indies. It is the grain with the second-highest worldwide production after corn. In this paper, we will evaluate the cause and effects of rices upply, demand, price elasticity, and market equilibrium point. Some of the major rice providers, like Thailand and China supply the world with rice. In order for a place to grow rice, it would require a lot of water and moisture like humidity (Workman, Daniel). If that country were to encounter a drought, like a major heat wave, it would require more maintenance for the crop to grow. Also, it can destroy the crop making it non-harvestable. If a crop is non- harvestable, with the money put into it, it would be a 100% loss. More heat equals more water needed to keep the crop on its growth ycle and more maintenance equals more money in labor. The amount of investment has direct relationship to the price of the rice. If there is less rice harvested because of a drought, the less supply there will be. If the demand stays constant, then the shortage of supply will result in an increase in price. In the other hand, when there are surplus of supply and demand is constant, there will be a decrease in price. If the supply is constant and the demand is changing, the price will also be affected where more demand creates shortage, and less demand creates surplus. Shortage will increase the price, and surplus will decrease the price. In 2008 the price of rice was at a high of 24 cents per pound, which was twice the price that was a year before. When the price of rice rose, major rice exporters banned the export of rice to other parts of the world. These countries were nervous that the increase in price would cause the low-income residents to become angry. So they decided to keep most of the rice within their country and hope that would bring down or at least keep the price of rice stable (Bradsher, 2008). This kind of action influences the product market equilibrium where consumers expect to pay more due to lower supply and higher demand. When the government decides to set a price for the rice, the price floor is set above the market equilibrium. The price floor prevents the prices from being too low. The higher price will causes a decrease in demand, as some consumers will be look for another more affordable substitution in the same commodity. Another factor that causes the increase of rice price was due to a general upward trend in grain prices caused by droughts in major producing countries, particularly Australia. Although there are no shortages of rice on world markets the general upward trend in grain prices led to panic buying and government rice export sanctions. The